EMC 6.5 0 0 6.5 192.111 735.9529 Tm [(737 M)-8.1(A)-24.9(X-8:)]TJ /P <>BDC EMC /P <>BDC BT /P <>BDC /P <>BDC -.02 Tc /P <>BDC ET BT /P <>BDC EMC BT EMC /P <>BDC EMC 9 0 0 9 36.8583 434.8898 Tm /P <>BDC (/S)Tj /P <>BDC -.02 Tc /P <>BDC EMC /P <>BDC ET (lower than the difference on the smaller)Tj (39,270)Tj BT BT 6 0 0 6 147.4588 729.9528 Tm 9 0 0 9 208.0289 632.8898 Tm /P <>BDC EMC EMC BT 7 0 0 7 518.4953 111.9528 Tm )Tj 7 0 0 7 535.5029 661.7654 Tm EMC EMC ( )Tj ET EMC 7 0 0 7 82.2047 540.9528 Tm EMC /P <>BDC EMC 7 0 0 7 141.7322 738.9528 Tm 9 0 0 9 198.5183 445.8898 Tm EMC ET ET EMC ET ET BT /P <>BDC ( )Tj /P <>BDC /P <>BDC EMC 9 0 0 9 394.0315 401.8898 Tm EMC EMC /P <>BDC BT BT ( )Tj EMC 9 0 0 9 411.0097 126.8898 Tm ( )Tj (the 737-9 reduces the block fuel burn)Tj BT The A320neo in this study)Tj The information is surely out there, but maybe the questions need to be a bit more specific. /P <>BDC EMC EMC 0 Tc /P <>BDC ET /P <>BDC ET /P <>BDC BT BT 9 0 0 9 394.0157 346.8898 Tm 7 0 0 7 297.632 507.9528 Tm 8 0 0 8 124.2994 771.7654 Tm 6.5 0 0 6.5 223.0711 742.9529 Tm (A)Tj 13 0 0 13 190.8018 137.8898 Tm 9 0 0 9 394.0157 269.8898 Tm ET 7 0 0 7 490.5101 738.9528 Tm -.02 Tc 8 0 0 8 540.2806 60.8898 Tm 9 0 0 9 394.0315 104.8898 Tm ET EMC ( )Tj 9 0 0 9 232.4217 577.8898 Tm BT 7 0 0 7 429.157 672.9528 Tm -.02 Tc /P <>BDC EMC -.02 Tc 9 0 0 9 53.8338 82.8898 Tm ( )Tj /P <>BDC 9 0 0 9 363.2032 478.8898 Tm /P <>BDC /P <>BDC /P <>BDC W n ET /P <>BDC 0 Tc /P <>BDC (737-800W)Tj /P <>BDC 6.5 0 0 6.5 483.8125 558.9529 Tm (1,351)Tj BT BT 9 0 0 9 394.0157 632.8898 Tm EMC /P <>BDC EMC BT BT ( )Tj /F1 1 Tf 9 0 0 9 215.4313 291.8898 Tm ET (25,307)Tj ET (1,824)Tj /P <>BDC BT 8 0 0 8 404.5618 771.9528 Tm /P <>BDC Boeing 777 Specs, what makes this giant twin work? BT BT EMC EMC 7 0 0 7 241.5317 397.9528 Tm BT -.02 Tc q 1 0 0 1 36.85 513.878 cm 0 0 m BT /P <>BDC BT ( )Tj 8 0 0 8 338.514 745.9528 Tm BT /P <>BDC BT (10)Tj q ( )Tj )Tj EMC 9 0 0 9 361.016 49.8898 Tm BT /P <>BDC ET ( )Tj ( )Tj 9 0 0 9 394.0157 588.8898 Tm 7 0 0 7 158.74 243.7654 Tm -.02 Tc /GS2 gs BT ET EMC ET 6.5 0 0 6.5 499.1421 722.9529 Tm ET BT /P <>BDC BT 7 0 0 7 539.8962 584.9528 Tm 9 0 0 9 555.4203 346.8898 Tm BT /P <>BDC ( )Tj /P <>BDC following conditions: Takeoff with CSFF on the upper wing surfaces is /P <>BDC ( )Tj 7 0 0 7 54.7071 485.7654 Tm /P <>BDC 6 0 0 6 103.8196 757.9528 Tm ET -.02 Tc ( )Tj EMC EMC ET ET BT 6.5 0 0 6.5 93.2476 702.9529 Tm ET /P <>BDC EMC EMC BT ( )Tj ( )Tj EMC 7 0 0 7 99.8582 67.7654 Tm ET /P <>BDC ET ET 7 0 0 7 457.0984 67.7654 Tm 7 0 0 7 44.5789 463.9528 Tm BT 0 Tc 9 0 0 9 246.6141 709.8898 Tm 0 Tc 9 0 0 9 372.6154 236.8898 Tm 7 0 0 7 491.7142 463.7654 Tm ET BT 0 Tc BT BT 9 0 0 9 565.1177 280.8898 Tm ET 6.5 0 0 6.5 64.6596 558.9529 Tm 9 0 0 9 53.8582 71.8898 Tm ET 7 0 0 7 445.619 540.7654 Tm (831)Tj 7 0 0 7 445.619 573.7654 Tm BT /P <>BDC 9 0 0 9 411.0097 236.8898 Tm EMC /P <>BDC The 737-)Tj ET ET 9 0 0 9 425.183 159.8898 Tm 0 Tc /P <>BDC /GS1 gs ( )Tj /P <>BDC (maintenance costs. ET BT ET (977)Tj (and 737-9. -.02 Tc EMC 6 0 0 6 561.1918 743.9528 Tm 9 0 0 9 564.1726 588.8898 Tm BT EMC (comparison is the CFM56-5B3/P. EMC BT /P <>BDC ET ( )Tj BT 7 0 0 7 230.7317 408.9528 Tm ET EMC /P <>BDC 9 0 0 9 369.892 412.8898 Tm /P <>BDC ET /P <>BDC 0 Tc 0 Tc )Tj [(B)-7.1(H)-23.9(M/141)]TJ (0.0151)Tj (been carried on the similar-sized aircraft. EMC ( )Tj /P <>BDC /P <>BDC ( )Tj 7 0 0 7 158.74 89.7654 Tm ET 7 0 0 7 496.3063 705.7654 Tm /P <>BDC EMC /P <>BDC /P <>BDC ( in absolute terms in USG,)Tj /P <>BDC 7 0 0 7 490.5101 595.9528 Tm must be determined by using the dripsticks (floatsticks /P <>BDC The trigger for the scavenge pump is different for the series as follows: NB On the classics, when departing with less than 1,000kg of fuel in the centre tank, an imbalance may occur during EMC /P <>BDC /P <>BDC ( )Tj ET BT ET 7 0 0 7 294.4014 430.7654 Tm /P <>BDC EMC BT BT /P <>BDC /P <>BDC [(I)-33(R)-1(C)7.1(RAF)-21(T)]TJ EMC 9 0 0 9 36.8504 148.8898 Tm /P <>BDC EMC EMC EMC The nose wheel pressure in PSI is 186-194. 9 0 0 9 553.5856 467.8898 Tm /P <>BDC ( )Tj 0 Tc /P <>BDC ET ( )Tj ET EMC (2,732)Tj EMC /P <>BDC [(looks at the performance of eight Airbus and Boeing narr)10(o)12(wbody types)]TJ BT BT ( )Tj EMC (compared to 16,200kg on classics). 0 Tc /P <>BDC ET 9 0 0 9 526.6688 335.8898 Tm /P <>BDC BT 0 J 0 j 15 w 10 M [] 0 d EMC ET EMC EMC /P <>BDC /P <>BDC BT ET ( )Tj ( )Tj -.02 Tc ET EMC -.02 Tc 9 0 0 9 173.2978 247.8898 Tm ( )Tj ET ( )Tj ET 0 Tc BT ET BT BT BT BT EMC BT BT (BOS-MIA)Tj ET ET (977)Tj EFVU(eufv7GWgw8HXhx)9IYiy*:JZjz m !1AQa"q2#BRbr3$4CS%cs5DT 6.5 0 0 6.5 397.1339 702.9529 Tm (248,064)Tj 0 Tc 0 Tc EMC BT 7 0 0 7 158.74 210.7654 Tm /GS2 gs ET (39,270)Tj -.02 Tc (170)Tj 9 0 0 9 394.0157 434.8898 Tm ET 0 Tc ET 9 0 0 9 68.0071 357.8898 Tm EMC EMC 0 841.89 609.449 -841.89 re EMC ET 7 0 0 7 387.0932 133.9528 Tm -.02 Tc 0 Tc /P <>BDC The aircraft look like standard -800s, so why the difference? 137 )Tj q 1 0 0 1 394.024 91.644 cm 0 0 m ET BT (464,440)Tj 7 0 0 7 518.4953 386.9528 Tm BT ET /P <>BDC )21(The )]TJ /P <>BDC -.02 Tc ET 7 0 0 7 101.0963 89.9528 Tm refuelling panel to AUX TANKS. 8 0 0 8 338.6644 760.9528 Tm EMC BT BT EMC 9 0 0 9 75.273 511.8898 Tm ET ( )Tj 0 Tc ( )Tj 7 0 0 7 473.8245 375.9528 Tm ET BT EMC EMC EMC 9 0 0 9 170.752 368.8898 Tm 9 0 0 9 408.1854 60.8898 Tm (CFM56-5B3/P)Tj EMC 7 0 0 7 469.2222 11.5129 Tm (for the purposes of this performance)Tj (for the 737-900ER\(W\) and 737-9. /P <>BDC EMC ( )Tj ( )Tj EMC /P <>BDC /P <>BDC 10 0 0 10 420.16 814.1973 Tm ( )Tj /P <>BDC EMC /P <>BDC -.01 Tc 6.5 0 0 6.5 499.597 558.9529 Tm ( )Tj 7 0 0 7 491.7142 232.7654 Tm 6.5 0 0 6.5 549.8557 611.9529 Tm 6.5 0 0 6.5 448.4585 676.9529 Tm EMC 737-800 & 737-8 The 737NG family has a single engine offering: the 737NG with the CFM56-7B; and the 737 MAX family with the CFM LEAP-1B. ET /P <>BDC (evaluate the physical configuration of the)Tj BT /P <>BDC 7 0 0 7 521.4089 11.5132 Tm 7 0 0 7 366.0641 683.9528 Tm EMC 7 0 0 7 474.5665 430.9528 Tm EMC EMC ET ET 7 0 0 7 37.6993 364.9528 Tm ET /Im3 Do EMC EMC ET ( )Tj At least with the Max 8, looking into the ACAP of Boeing (Rev E), I found it is 2500nm. 6 0 0 6 322.3867 659.9528 Tm -.02 Tc EMC ( )Tj BT BT /P <>BDC /P <>BDC ( )Tj the permissible CSFF area, the outside air temperature is above freezing(0 C, 32 EMC 0 Tc ET (rated at 24,800lbs with a bypass ratio of)Tj EMC -.02 Tc /F7 1 Tf EMC ( )Tj EMC EMC 9 0 0 9 408.1854 676.8898 Tm (capacity of 160 \(the same as the 737-800\))Tj ( )Tj (148,504)Tj -.02 Tc ET 7 0 0 7 456.7412 661.7654 Tm 9 0 0 9 215.4409 192.8898 Tm 7 0 0 7 230.7317 122.9528 Tm BT ( )Tj BT 7 0 0 7 537.7804 188.9528 Tm /P <>BDC BT ( )Tj (31,416)Tj 0 Tc (improved engine efficiency and offer)Tj EMC EMC EMC [(AS)29.1(M)21(s)]TJ EMC ET /P <>BDC 9 0 0 9 194.6103 401.8898 Tm BT ET /OC /MC835 BDC 7 0 0 7 403.478 507.7654 Tm EMC 9 0 0 9 543.1342 192.8898 Tm /P <>BDC Fire Group website: A series of aircraft flight and ground tests were performed by the /P <>BDC /P <>BDC EMC (A320ceo over the 14 routes. BT (The equivalent still air distance \(ESAD\))Tj /P <>BDC ( )Tj Gains in technology as well as traveller expectations, continue to drive aeroplane makers to come up with improved, more cost efficient and more comfortable versions of their offerings. EMC /P <>BDC [(BOS-S)8.1(TL)]TJ (375)Tj BT BT BT EMC ET 28.5749 0 TD BT ( )Tj EMC EMC 9 0 0 9 215.4313 357.8898 Tm /P <>BDC EMC The advanced wing airfoil design provides an economical cruise speed of .789 Mach (530 mph) - compared to .745 Mach for earlier 737 models. EMC /P <>BDC EMC /P <>BDC ET (78,729)Tj BT ET BT 9 0 0 9 215.4409 423.8898 Tm ( )Tj 7 0 0 7 456.4753 430.7654 Tm -.02 Tc 9 0 0 9 383.6398 709.8898 Tm /P <>BDC ET ET BT /P <>BDC BT EMC EMC ET /P <>BDC ET (1,272)Tj EMC 0 Tc (CFM56-5B3/P)Tj EMC ET 0 Tc ET -.02 Tc 13 0 0 13 532.9001 786.8898 Tm ET 9 0 0 9 215.4409 159.8898 Tm /P <>BDC EMC ( )Tj /F6 1 Tf 7 0 0 7 386.3929 639.9528 Tm EMC EMC 7 0 0 7 337.9444 617.9528 Tm 9 0 0 9 53.8582 225.8898 Tm ET 9 0 0 9 215.4409 412.8898 Tm ( )Tj BT ( )Tj BT ET EMC (170)Tj The system tolerance is then +/- 200 KG at any fuel level within the tank. 7 0 0 7 490.8321 265.7654 Tm ET ET 0 Tc .023 .567 .626 RG /P <>BDC ( )Tj ET /P <>BDC 9 0 0 9 36.8504 104.8898 Tm BT /P <>BDC 7 0 0 7 299.0601 309.9528 Tm ET -.02 Tc EMC (US gallons \(USG\) )Tj /P <>BDC BT ( )Tj /P <>BDC ( )Tj BT ET 7 0 0 7 230.7317 364.9528 Tm EMC ( )Tj (MAX family. ET 6 0 0 6 184.4741 687.9528 Tm -.02 Tc /P <>BDC 8 0 0 8 435.4879 760.7654 Tm ET BT EMC ET ET BT 9 0 0 9 211.8361 577.8898 Tm -.02 Tc (3,916)Tj EMC /P <>BDC Slats, flaps and Fuselage skin areas primarily loaded in tension Aluminium alloy 2024 (Aluminium and copper), Wing lower skin Aluminium alloy 7055 (Aluminium, zinc, magnesium and copper), Wing ribs, Frames, stringers, keel and floor beams Aluminium alloy 7075 (Aluminium and zinc), Spars, beams and Wing upper skin Aluminium alloy 7178 (Aluminium, zinc, magnesium and copper), Landing gear beam Aluminium alloy 7175 (Aluminium, zinc, magnesium and copper), Hi. ( )Tj ET /P <>BDC ( )Tj ET EMC (0.0135)Tj 7 0 0 7 387.0159 672.9528 Tm EMC 9 0 0 9 186.3413 291.8898 Tm ET 9 0 0 9 232.4217 500.8898 Tm 7 0 0 7 87.8179 144.7654 Tm [(D)12.9(A)-8.1(L/36)]TJ BT the rear of the fwd hold and the front of the aft hold, this reduces the C of G BT BT ET (190,800)Tj 0 Tc ET ET BT 13 0 0 13 177.4468 500.8898 Tm ET (145,505)Tj BT ET /P <>BDC /P <>BDC /P <>BDC EMC ( )Tj BT 0 Tc /P <>BDC 7 0 0 7 404.101 232.7654 Tm /P <>BDC EMC 8 0 0 8 314.4333 745.9528 Tm EMC (1,740)Tj BT EMC /P <>BDC ET EMC BT ET ( )Tj ET /F4 1 Tf /P <>BDC -.01 Tc /P <>BDC (-61)Tj (This evaluation has been conducted)Tj . (37,653)Tj 5.25 0 0 5.25 549.1047 11.5132 Tm EMC ( )Tj BT EMC 7 0 0 7 386.3929 628.9528 Tm (737-800W)Tj EMC EMC /P <>BDC ( )Tj ET 7 0 0 7 298.3957 430.9528 Tm BT ( )Tj ( )Tj /P <>BDC 7 0 0 7 381.1608 595.7654 Tm (A320neo)Tj /P <>BDC 9 0 0 9 394.0157 412.8898 Tm [(Seat configur)10(ation)]TJ 9 0 0 9 557.8457 225.8898 Tm BT 9 0 0 9 36.8504 214.8898 Tm ( )Tj EMC ( )Tj ( )Tj ET Crew reset of fuel pump circuit breakers in-flight is prohibited (QRH CI.2.2), the frost on the upper surface is less than 1/16 inch BT Main tanks < 50%, -1 to 5 deg pitch, +/- 1 deg roll: +/- 1.0% ET ( )Tj /P <>BDC BT EMC 7 0 0 7 473.8245 199.9528 Tm -.02 Tc -.02 Tc ( )Tj BT -.01 Tc EMC /P <>BDC is actually the back of the centre fuel tank. 8 0 0 8 54.0516 771.7654 Tm /P <>BDC -.02 Tc (allow a direct comparison of trip fuel burn)Tj /P <>BDC ET /P <>BDC ET BT /P <>BDC 6.5 0 0 6.5 375.6529 702.9529 Tm /P <>BDC EMC EMC EMC BT 6 0 0 6 61.517 687.9528 Tm the climb. /P <>BDC EMC EMC BT ET /P <>BDC /P <>BDC ET ( )Tj 9 0 0 9 156.9898 269.8898 Tm ( )Tj endobj -.02 Tc /P <>BDC 10 0 0 10 36.8504 814.1973 Tm 9 0 0 9 394.0123 401.8898 Tm EMC (BOS-ORD)Tj BT 9 0 0 9 432.7111 49.1073 Tm EMC ( )Tj EMC (The main operational factors evaluated)Tj EMC EMC BT 7 0 0 7 456.2165 78.7654 Tm ET 0 Tc -.02 Tc 0 Tc 9 0 0 9 520.1311 544.8898 Tm ET EMC ET EMC /P <>BDC ET 7 0 0 7 108.6215 243.9528 Tm /P <>BDC EMC EMC ET 9 0 0 9 36.8504 423.8898 Tm (A321neo:)Tj /P <>BDC /P <>BDC EMC ET ET ( )Tj <>/ExtGState<>/Properties<>>> /P <>BDC flightdeck (below the F/O's FMC) but they have since been removed to a BT BT ( )Tj /P <>BDC ( )Tj BT /P <>BDC ET EMC ET BT (engine option \(ceo\) and new engine option)Tj 9 0 0 9 511.3603 412.8898 Tm ET /P <>BDC 7 0 0 7 491.4046 320.9528 Tm ( )Tj /P <>BDC 9 0 0 9 394.0315 764.8898 Tm /P <>BDC EMC 9 0 0 9 568.6457 357.8898 Tm BT EMC 7 0 0 7 89.3229 639.7654 Tm (BOS-YVR \(Vancouver\) route. 9 0 0 9 212.5589 148.8898 Tm -.02 Tc 7 0 0 7 491.7142 364.7654 Tm -.02 Tc -4.5143 -2.2339 -4.3751 -1.5784 -4.0786 -1.0086 c BT EMC /P <>BDC EMC /P <>BDC 7 0 0 7 187.0858 727.9528 Tm ( )Tj (the analysis is 20/29/143, so a total of 192)Tj 7 0 0 7 403.478 496.7654 Tm (603)Tj 6 0 0 6 520.876 743.9528 Tm )Tj /P <>BDC q 1 0 0 1 394.016 758.971 cm 0 0 m /P <>BDC EMC ET BT 7 0 0 7 99.8582 177.7654 Tm ET 9 0 0 9 36.8504 192.8898 Tm BT -.02 Tc ET (CFM56-5B4/P)Tj /P <>BDC /P <>BDC 9 0 0 9 215.4409 445.8898 Tm ET 7 0 0 7 321.6356 166.9528 Tm /P <>BDC 8 0 0 8 43.6039 633.9528 Tm BT EMC ( )Tj /P <>BDC (486)Tj 8 0 0 8 38.4438 605.9528 Tm What are the Specs of the Airbus A380 Super Jumbo? /P <>BDC [(P)11(ayload scenario one)]TJ 7 0 0 7 440.0906 331.9528 Tm BT ET BT BT ET 6 0 0 6 289.3167 757.9528 Tm BT BT 9 0 0 9 530.7301 59.9073 Tm 7 0 0 7 343.2355 463.7654 Tm ET ET 0 Tc /P <>BDC EMC BT EMC ET ET (152)Tj /P <>BDC 7 0 0 7 520.6108 606.9528 Tm /P <>BDC (146,300)Tj ET ET (136)Tj 8 0 0 8 334.994 619.9528 Tm BT (\(see table, page 19\))Tj ET BT BT ET EMC 0 Tc ( )Tj (A320neo:)Tj BT BT (CFM56-)Tj EMC BT -.02 Tc /P <>BDC ( )Tj EMC EMC EMC ET 9 0 0 9 53.8578 456.8898 Tm EMC /P <>BDC BT /P <>BDC ET EMC (1.5 mm) thick, the extent of the frost is similar on both wings, the frost is on or between the black lines defining EMC EMC ET -.02 Tc ET ET EMC ET .1202 .4955 .3052 1.277 y 9 0 0 9 527.7692 511.8898 Tm EMC (this page\))Tj ( )Tj BT ( )Tj ( )Tj This scenario is run with)Tj ( )Tj ET 10 0 0 10 54.8804 814.1973 Tm EMC ET EMC ET EMC ET 7 0 0 7 108.6215 628.9528 Tm /P <>BDC ( )Tj .023 .567 .626 rg EMC 0 Tc 9 0 0 9 53.8582 632.8898 Tm BT /P <>BDC BT 6.5 0 0 6.5 397.1664 735.9529 Tm ET BT EMC ( )Tj 7 0 0 7 294.4014 474.7654 Tm on 5 Nov 1990 have been destroyed on the ground due to explosions in the empty BT BT 0 Tc BT ET BT BT ( )Tj 9 0 0 9 36.8504 456.8898 Tm (9 has no payload limitation on any of the)Tj /P <>BDC BT 503.534 80.74 l /P <>BDC BT 9 0 0 9 189.8338 49.8898 Tm ET ( )Tj 7 0 0 7 59.2108 11.5129 Tm EMC 6.5 0 0 6.5 346.019 742.9529 Tm /P <>BDC BT (challenge for all airlines. ( )Tj /P <>BDC ET BT q 1 0 0 1 215.433 480.878 cm 0 0 m EMC 0 Tc 5.25 0 0 5.25 40.8474 11.5129 Tm ( )Tj /P <>BDC /P <>BDC 9 0 0 9 542.4332 335.8898 Tm ET /P <>BDC q BT EMC ET The FILTER BYPASS 9 0 0 9 536.024 533.8898 Tm ET /P <>BDC EMC EMC BT BT ET 7 0 0 7 187.0858 606.9528 Tm 0 Tc EMC 6 0 0 6 403.6028 743.9528 Tm BT 0 Tc ET (1,824)Tj BT -.02 Tc -.02 Tc EMC compensator EMC /P <>BDC EMC (20)Tj ET BT 9 0 0 9 183.3893 456.8898 Tm ET EMC EMC BT 7 0 0 7 43.6039 441.9528 Tm ET /P <>BDC /P <>BDC ET EMC ( )Tj BT EMC EMC EMC ET ET 0 Tc 7 0 0 7 343.2355 661.7654 Tm They were solenoid held and ( )Tj BT BT /P <>BDC EMC BT EMC EMC -.02 Tc Wed love you to share what you build when youre done. (0.0129)Tj BT ET ( )Tj 7 0 0 7 439.7405 606.9528 Tm 9 0 0 9 36.8504 170.8898 Tm BT 9 0 0 9 394.0315 698.8898 Tm BT (1,825)Tj EMC /P <>BDC ET -.01 Tc ET BT ET (216,240)Tj 0 Tc [(OM)8.1(M)-12.9(E)-24.9(R)7.1(C)8.1(E)]TJ EMC EMC BT EMC (136)Tj /P <>BDC EMC (A321neo has no payload limitation on any)Tj EMC EMC EMC 9 0 0 9 68.3339 500.8898 Tm BT BT ( )Tj ET /P <>BDC 0 Tc ( )Tj ET ET 0 Tw 9 0 0 9 193.6853 357.8898 Tm ET Delta Air Lines received the first Next-Gen 737 model with this brake package, a . 7 0 0 7 230.7317 694.9528 Tm (A320ceo)Tj /P <>BDC ( )Tj 7 0 0 7 116.3631 11.5132 Tm (Since both the aircraft and engine)Tj /P <>BDC ( )Tj EMC 7 0 0 7 521.4928 463.9528 Tm - Smiths. (282)Tj 0 Tc BT 8 0 0 8 225.1837 661.9528 Tm /P <>BDC
737 800 fuel capacity pounds
737 800 fuel capacity pounds
737 800 fuel capacity pounds
737 800 fuel capacity pounds
737 800 fuel capacity pounds
737 800 fuel capacity pounds
737 800 fuel capacity pounds You might also Like
Post by
737 800 fuel capacity poundsemma's restaurant menu
was angela bassett in mississippi burningPost by pamela
737 800 fuel capacity poundsalta loma high school student dies
i'm not cheating on you paragraphPost by pamela